Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Democritus's avatar

You sound depressed. You’re thinking about thinking.

D. Luscinius's avatar

The reason people find it easy to imagine non-physical forms of existence is because they are not actually doing it. They are imagining, as you say, which means they are considering sensible forms, which means they are really thinking about physical (albeit subtler or airier) forms.

And this is not an issue that arises from you being Kantian in any way: Any good Aristotelian-Thomist is familiar with the issues that arise from any sort of cognition in separated souls. The entire Aristotelian account of human knowledge depends on reference back to phantasms in the imagination which arise from the senses; and such phantasms depend on us having a brain, a corporeal organ. And so, deprived of a body, the typically human mode of cognition becomes impossible. I would venture to guess that St. Thomas only accepts that it is possible for a separated soul to know on account of indications in Scripture, most especially the story of the rich man and Lazarus (Lk 16) which he cites in half his articles on the knowledge of the separated soul (I, q. 89). Though he spends many words on this topic (many more than any fabled treatise on angels dancing on the head of a pin), he can only conclude that this knowledge differs in mode from natural human knowing and that it depends on some sort of divine light, which is given in a fitting but not absolute way.

Also: I too have no confidence one way or the other when it comes to how much my librarians like me. I am probably just a little too interested in their reading habits for them to like me. Oh well, they're my librarians, so they are stuck with me.

(Also too: If you figure out the cure for the particular malaise you have, please share.)

9 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?